Benachrichtigung aktivieren Dürfen wir Sie in Ihrem Browser über die wichtigsten Nachrichten des Handelsblatts informieren? Sie erhalten 2-5 Meldungen pro Tag.
Fast geschafft Erlauben Sie Ihnen Benachrichtigungen zu schicken. Dies können Sie in der Meldung Ihres Browsers bestätigen.
Benachrichtigungen erfolgreich aktiviert Wir halten Sie ab sofort über die wichtigsten Nachrichten des Handelsblatts auf dem Laufenden. Sie erhalten 2-5 Meldungen pro Tag.
Jetzt Aktivieren
Nein, danke

The outside view Let this coalition fall apart

Germany’s governing coalition is not „grand“ but pathetic. Why not let it collapse and try minority government?

„Maaßens Versetzung war eine richtige Entscheidung“

Another month, another phony crisis in the „grand coalition“, another skillful fudge by the chancellor, and another sad return to business as usual. Germany’s government this week yet again performed an act somewhere between Kabuki and the Theater of the Absurd.

A second-tier bureaucrat (Maaßen) says inappropriate things. The coalition partners issue duelling quasi-ultimatums about how to deal with him. The coalition briefly seems at risk of rupture. A last-minute deal (a) removes the bureaucrat from his job by (b) promoting him from pay grade B9 to B11 in another bureaucracy.

And so Germany’s government stumbles onward. Angela Merkel can say that she has yet again held on to power. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier can claim that „stability“ has been preserved. The coalition keeps biding its time with trivialities.

This is not good enough. Not for the EU’s largest economy. Not at a time of climate change, digital revolution, rising populism, and uncontrolled migration. Not when government has so much to do.

The CDU, CSU and SPD were never meant to be together again. They are partners only because other coalitions, alas, were not possible this time. But if this coalition collapses, it’s not too late to try the next-best option.

That option is a minority government. Germans are aghast at the idea, which they associate with the Weimar Republic. That is unfair. Many mature democracies, from our friends in Canada to those Down Under, have long experience with minority government. All it means is that leaders must seek ad hoc majorities in parliament on the merits of each policy. This makes for shifting majorities and often strange bedfellows, scrambling old allegiances. It also elevates the role of reasoning and oratory in law-making.

Minority government thus downgrades partisan structures, but up‧grades parliament as such.

By doing so, it approximates republican vigor as imagined by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. In the Federalist Papers, they worried about the rise of „factions“. They wanted the people’s representatives to be free thinkers, loyal not to a party but to their voters and country. Germany has a different tradition. Its constitution, unlike America’s, explicitly mentions parties as political organs. That is fine. Nobody is suggesting that parties should be abolished – merely that democracy can work without formal coalitions between them.

But minority government does demand a certain kind of leader. Ideally, a Pericles or Churchill. At minimum someone with clear visions, bold language, and inspiring contrasts. Angela Merkel, for all her prowess in the past 13 years, is not that person.

Die wichtigsten Neuigkeiten jeden Morgen in Ihrem Posteingang.

Mehr zu: The outside view - Let this coalition fall apart

0 Kommentare zu "The outside view: Let this coalition fall apart"

Das Kommentieren dieses Artikels wurde deaktiviert.